Windmill Wellness Ranch

Full title: WINDMILL WELLNESS RANCH, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division

Date published: Jul 28, 2023

Facts

This case involves a dispute over the alleged non-payment or underpayment of numerous medical claims. This background section describes the procedural history of the case and then summarizes the factual allegations in the operative complaint.

Issue

Court Judgement

A party’s failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report shall bar the party from a de novo determination by the district court. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52 (1985); Acuna v. Brown & Root, Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 340 (5th Cir. 2000). Additionally, failure to file timely written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this Report and Recommendation shall bar the aggrieved party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Also, Read

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 − 13 =