Trumbull County Indictments

Full title: STEVEN HENDERSON, et al., Plaintiffs v. TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 30, 2005

Facts

This matter is before the Court upon the following motions: (1) Summary Judgment Motion of Defendants Trumbull County Children Services Board and Robert Kubiak (applicable also to unidentified CSB Supervisors and Employees), see (Dkt. # 22); (2) Motion for Summary Judgment of City of Warren Police Department, see (Dkt. # 26); (3) Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant City of Warren, Ohio, see (Dkt. # 27); and (4) Motion for Summary Judgment, see (Dkt. # 29), filed on behalf of Trumbull County, Ohio, Trumbull County Prosecutor’s Office, Sarah Kovoor, Dennis Watkins, and John Doe Supervisors, One-Five. 

Issue

Whether the evidence presents a sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury or whether it is so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law.

Decision

the Court hereby orders that that (1) Summary Judgment Motion of Defendants Trumbull County Children Services Board and Robert Kubiak (applicable also to unidentified CSB Supervisors and Employees), see (Dkt. # 22); (2) Motion for Summary Judgment of City of Warren Police Department, see (Dkt. # 26); (3) Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant City of Warren, Ohio, see (Dkt. # 27); and (4) Motion for Summary Judgment, see (Dkt. # 29), filed on behalf of Trumbull County, Ohio, Trumbull County Prosecutor’s Office, Sarah Kovoor, Dennis Watkins, and John Doe Supervisors, One-Five are GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART. Summary judgment is rendered in favor of all defendants on the first, second, third and fourth claims for relief asserted in the Complaint. The remaining state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

eight + three =