SIGA Techs., Inc. v. PharmAthene, Inc.

Full title: SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v.

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

No. 314 2012.

Date published: May 24, 2013

Fact:

Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. 2627.

Upon appeal from the Court of Chancery. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

Stephen P. Lamb (argued), Meghan M. Dougherty and Laura C. Bower, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Andre G. Bouchard, Bouchard Margules & Friedlander, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel: Walter Rieman and Jaren Elizabeth Janghorbani, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York; Harold P. Weinberger, Jennifer L. Rochon, Seth F. Schinfeld, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, New York, New York for appellant. A. Richard Winchester and Christopher A. Selzer, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Of Counsel: Roger R. Crane (argued), Gerald A. Novack, Philip W. Rodgers, Christopher Carton, and Molly Nixon–Graf, K & L Gates, LLP, New York, New York for appellee.

Issue:

CONCLUSION:

For these reasons, we AFFIRM the Court of Chancery’s judgment in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

twelve − 3 =