Donna Moonda

Full title: United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Donna J. Moonda, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2006

Facts

A complaint has been filed against the defendant charging that “[o]n or about May 13, 2005, in Cuyahoga County in the Northern District of Ohio, . . . the defendant did travel in interstate commerce from Pennsylvania to Ohio, with the intent to kill Dr. Gulam Moonda, and in the course of, or as a result of, such travel placed Dr. Moonda in reasonable fear of death . . . and further resulted in the . . . death of Dr. Moonda, through the use of a dangerous weapon, to wit, a firearm” in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2261A, 924(j) and 2.

Issue

Whether any condition or combination of conditions . . . will reasonably assure the appearance of such person as required and the safety of any other person and the community

Decision

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4), the Court directs that:

The defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal; and

The defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with her counsel; and

That, on order of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.  (4:06 MJ 6049)

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

nineteen + 8 =