Bikoff v. Dowling

Full title: J. DARIUS BIKOFF, Plaintiff, v. JAMES DOWLING and PASTIME, Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

No. 16 CV 5478-LTS-SDA

Date published: Aug 20, 2018

Fact:

Plaintiff J. Darius Bikoff brings this action against Defendants James Dowling and Pastime asserting claims for common law fraud and violation of New York General Business Law § 349. Defendants now move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiff’s claims. (Docket entry no. 28.) The Court has jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions in connection with the instant motion practice and, for the following reasons, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted and the Complaint is dismissed.

Issue:

CONCLUSION:

For the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted and the Complaint is dismissed. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry no. 28. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case.

SO ORDERED. 

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

twenty + 20 =