Lemay v. Hush Bar & Lounge, Inc.

Full title: Corey LEMAY, respondent, v. HUSH BAR AND LOUNGE, INC., et al., defendants…

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Facts

The plaintiff allegedly was injured at the Hush Bar and Lounge (hereinafter Hush Bar) in Patchogue, when another patron, the defendant Nicholas Polito, struck him with a glass. The plaintiff commenced this action against Polito and the owner of Hush Bar, Hush Bar and Lounge, Inc. (hereinafter HB & L), and its manager, Ruben Cortes, as well as against the owner of the building in which Hush Bar was located, United Properties Corp. (hereinafter United). The plaintiff asserted claims based on negligence and violation of General Obligations Law § 11–101(1) against HB & L, Cortes, and United. Before discovery was conducted, United moved for summary judgment, inter alia, dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. In support thereof, United submitted an affidavit from its manager to the effect that it was an out-of-possession landlord with no control over the premises or the business of Hush Bar. The plaintiff opposed the motion on the ground that discovery had not yet been conducted but was necessary to determine the relationship between United and both HB & L and HB & L’s business. The Supreme Court denied United’s motion, with leave to renew after the completion of discovery.

Issue

Decision

As United correctly contends, the affidavit of its manager was sufficient to satisfy United’s prima facie burden ( seeCPLR 3212; Borelli v. 1051 Realty Corp., 242 A.D.2d 517661 N.Y.S.2d 290). Nonetheless, under the circumstances presented here, the plaintiff was entitled to discovery on the issue of United’s relationship to HB & L, Cortes, and Hush Bar in order to oppose the motion ( seeCPLR 3212[f]; cf. Murray v. ANB Corp., 74 A.D.3d 1548, 1549–1550902 N.Y.S.2d 708). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied United’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, with leave to renew after the completion of discovery.

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 × 5 =